🗄️ AWS Databases for Backend Engineers
RDS (PostgreSQL/MySQL) • DynamoDB • Aurora
🚀 Introduction
AWS offers multiple managed databases for different backend use cases — from transactional systems to high-throughput NoSQL workloads.
This guide covers the three most critical database services backend engineers must know:
| Service | Type | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| RDS (PostgreSQL/MySQL) | Relational | Traditional applications, OLTP workloads |
| Aurora | High-performance relational | Scalable, fault-tolerant modern apps |
| DynamoDB | NoSQL Key-Value / Document DB | Low-latency, large-scale apps, IoT, serverless |
This documentation includes real-world examples, architectures, and interview-grade insights.
🟦 1️⃣ Amazon RDS (PostgreSQL / MySQL)
Managed Relational Database | Automatic Backups | Multi-AZ
✅ What is RDS?
RDS is AWS’s managed relational database service supporting engines like:
-
PostgreSQL
-
MySQL
-
MariaDB
-
Oracle
-
SQL Server
AWS handles:
✅ Backups
✅ Patching
✅ Failover
✅ Monitoring
✅ Storage scaling
✅ Real-World Use Case – Backend API with PostgreSQL
Text Diagram
Common backend workloads:
-
User accounts
-
Transactions
-
Logging
-
Sessions
-
Product catalog
✅ Key Features
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Multi-AZ | Standby replica for failover |
| Read Replicas | Scale read traffic |
| Automated Backups | Point-in-time recovery |
| Storage autoscaling | Avoid storage exhaustion |
| Enhanced Monitoring | OS-level insights |
✅ Best Use Cases
-
Monolithic applications
-
Traditional transactional workloads
-
Apps requiring strong ACID consistency
-
Reporting and analytics using read replicas
🧠 Interview Tip
RDS = fully managed relational DB with multi-AZ failover and read replicas.
🟩 2️⃣ Amazon Aurora (MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible)
Distributed Storage | High Performance | Serverless Options
✅ What is Aurora?
Aurora is AWS’s modern relational database, compatible with:
-
PostgreSQL
-
MySQL
Aurora provides:
✅ 5× performance of MySQL
✅ 3× performance of PostgreSQL
✅ 6-way replicated storage
✅ Automatic failover
✅ Autoscaling (Aurora Serverless v2)
✅ Real-World Use Case – Scalable E-Commerce Application
Text Diagram
Aurora storage layer:
-
6 copies across 3 AZs
-
Auto-healing
-
Auto-scaling
✅ Key Features
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Serverless v2 | Auto-scaling compute |
| Multi-master | Multi-writer support (Aurora MySQL) |
| Fast failover | < 30 seconds |
| Global Database | Low-latency cross-region reads |
| Backtrack | "Undo" DB changes by minutes/hours |
✅ Best Use Cases
-
High-traffic backend systems
-
SaaS platforms
-
Enterprise OLTP systems
-
Multi-region apps
-
Microservices needing relational consistency at scale
🧠 Interview Tip
Aurora = high-performance, distributed relational database with auto-scaling.
🟨 3️⃣ Amazon DynamoDB
NoSQL Key-Value & Document Store | Serverless | Low-latency
✅ What is DynamoDB?
DynamoDB is AWS's serverless NoSQL database offering:
-
⚡ Ultra-low latency (single-digit ms)
-
Infinite horizontal scaling
-
Built-in HA across multiple AZs
-
Automatic partitioning
-
Pay-per-use (on-demand mode)
-
Fine-grained access control (IAM)
💡 Real-World Use Case – Metadata / IoT / High TPS Workloads
Text Diagram
Use cases:
-
IoT telemetry
-
User sessions
-
Shopping carts
-
Feature flag storage
-
Configuration/state
-
Gaming leaderboards
✅ Key Features
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| On-demand mode | Auto-scaling read/write capacity |
| Global Tables | Multi-region, active-active replication |
| Streams | Event handling for CDC |
| TTL | Auto-expiration of data |
| Single-digit ms latency | High throughput |
✅ DynamoDB vs RDS vs Aurora (Conceptual)
| Feature | DynamoDB | Aurora | RDS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | NoSQL | Relational | Relational |
| Scaling | Automatic | Automatic | Manual |
| Consistency | Eventually/Strong | Strong | Strong |
| SQL support | No | Yes | Yes |
| Transactions | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Best for | High TPS | Enterprise scale | Traditional apps |
🧠 Interview Tip
DynamoDB = NoSQL, auto-scaling, low-latency, high throughput.
🟥 4️⃣ High-Level Comparison: RDS vs Aurora vs DynamoDB
✅ Decision Table (Backend Engineer View)
| Feature | RDS | Aurora | DynamoDB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Database Model | Relational | Relational | NoSQL |
| Scaling | Vertical + Read replicas | Horizontal + Serverless | Fully horizontal |
| Performance | Good | Excellent | Extreme |
| Pricing | Instance-based | Higher (cluster-based) | Usage-based |
| Availability | Multi-AZ | 6 copies across 3 AZs | Multi-AZ (default) |
| Schema | Strict | Strict | Flexible |
| Use Case | Traditional apps | High-scale apps | High-throughput apps |
📘 5️⃣ Architecture Diagrams (ASCII)
✅ Multi-AZ RDS Architecture
✅ Aurora Cluster Architecture
✅ DynamoDB Architecture
🧠 6️⃣ Interview Questions & Answers
✅ RDS
Q: What is Multi-AZ?
A: Synchronous replication to a standby for automatic failover.
Q: How do read replicas work?
A: Asynchronous replication for read scaling only.
✅ Aurora
Q: Why is Aurora faster than RDS?
A: Distributed storage engine + high-performance cache + parallel writes.
Q: What is Aurora Serverless?
A: Auto-scaling compute capacity based on load.
✅ DynamoDB
Q: How does DynamoDB scale?
A: Automatic partitioning based on key access patterns.
Q: What is DynamoDB Streams?
A: Real-time change data capture (CDC).
✅ 7️⃣ Best Practices Summary
✅ RDS
-
Use Multi-AZ for production
-
Use parameter groups for tuning
-
Avoid storing files/blobs
-
Use read replicas for read-heavy workloads
✅ Aurora
-
Prefer Serverless for unpredictable workloads
-
Use performance insights
-
Use global database for cross-region reads
✅ DynamoDB
-
Use partition keys designed for distribution
-
Use TTL for expiring data
-
Enable auto-scaling
-
Use Streams for event-driven patterns
✅ Final Takeaways
| Service | Choose When |
|---|---|
| RDS | You need traditional SQL with stable workloads |
| Aurora | You need relational with high performance & auto-scaling |
| DynamoDB | You need massive scale, ultra-low latency, flexible schema |
Backend engineers typically use all three in different architectures — the key is choosing the right database for the job.
No comments:
Post a Comment